| |
The energy crisis is real.
The energy crisis exists in many forms. For example, there is
an inadequate supply of electricity at peak demand times, and
there is an inadequate supply of oil and natural gas relative to
worldwide demand.
The question is “What solutions are currently available”?
In addition to increased conservation and research into
affordable renewable energy sources, Fernald Power Corporation
takes a position that more large scale, relatively conventional
electrical generating plants should be constructed, and that the
fuels for these large plants should be diversified. Because
there are many existing plants that use natural gas, more new
coal-fired and new nuclear plants should be built to diversify
the fuel sources.
Since 2001, the increasing price of oil and natural gas and
the continued uncertainty of energy supply and transmission have
led to a much greater appreciation for the use of coal for
fueling electrical generating plants. It is also interesting to
note that since 2001, coal-based power consumed in California
has increased from 16% to 20%, all from out of state sources.
With Governor Schwarzenegger’s announcement of a proposed
12,000 MW transmission line between California and Wyoming, it
is clear that Coal-fired power will be coming to California. It
is no longer “if” but “where and when” it will be built.
The document titled
“Continuation…” addresses many features and benefits to
building a large power plant and Hydrogen Production Facility in
California, as compared to building it in another western state.
From the point of view of Californians, why should so many
permanent, well-paying jobs be exported out of California?
Why should these plants for supplying power to California
residents be located out of California so that they would be
less efficient (producing more CO2) than they were located in
California?
Scientists have proposed the use of Hydrogen as fuel for cars
in order to reduce pollution and to reduce dependence on foreign
oil and natural gas. Hydrogen must be manufactured in huge
quantities to be useful for millions of vehicles. However, for
these purposes, Hydrogen is a “transport energy”, not a basic
fuel. There is no place on our planet where hydrogen naturally
exists in significant quantities for these purposes. Hydrogen
must be separated from other sources.
Any source should be used to produce Hydrogen except natural
gas. Natural gas is a very clean burning fuel by itself. It is
more efficient and less greenhouse gases are emitted when
natural gas is used as fuel for a combustion engine. Separating
the hydrogen out of the natural gas requires a good deal of
energy and has other by-products such as CO2.
Market forces are also a disincentive to using natural gas.
Natural gas is in limited supply, and the supply is becoming
more limited over time. Natural gas is also used in many
industrial applications which compete for the supply, and for
which there is no substitute. Basic economics say that a product
in high demand with limited supply is bound to increase in
price. If the price is controlled by government, then there is
sure to be shortages.
The two primary sources of energy for making Hydrogen in
large quantities are Coal and Nuclear. Because the Nuclear
source is not likely to be accepted in the near future, coal
remains the primary candidate.
Fernald Power Corporation takes the position that the
Hydrogen economy, especially in the form of the Hydrogen Highway
should, and can, be pursued with vigor.
In response to the desire to accelerate the introduction of
Hydrogen to power cars, Fernald Power Corporation has developed
the concept of adding a large Hydrogen Production facility
directly to and integrated with the electrical generation plant.
The Hydrogen Production facility (called a Hydrofizer™ Plant)
would make Hydrogen from water using the electrolysis method. In
the case of an Electrical generation plant sized at 5000 MW, the
Hydrofizer™ Plant could be sized to use approximately 3600 MW
which would produce about 1800 tons per day of Hydrogen. This is
sufficient to supply 1.8 million autos along the “Hydrogen
Highway” and should improve air quality, particularly in
locations such as the LA basin.
Each Hydrogen production facility
(Hydrofizer™) of this size can reduce our dependence on foreign
oil by 0.18 %. Three plants producing over 5000 tons of Hydrogen
per day could displace over 0.5 % of the foreign oil imported
into the US annually.
The Fernald Power Corporation concept includes a
model for how to get
Hydrogen from the Hydrofizer™ Plant to customers using
returnable and reusable tanks that minimize handling of Hydrogen
by customers, thereby emphasizing safety.
Regarding emissions, a coal-fired power plant would be built
with the latest in Clean Coal Technology to minimize the impact
on the environment. The plant provides many “offsets” that help
the environment, including (1) eliminating essentially all of
the exhaust fumes from automobiles that are converted to
Hydrogen, and (2) being a plant that makes Hydrogen using power
from the nonrenewable energy sources that are connected to the
grid nearby, regardless of the time of day that these
nonrenewable sources operate.
|
"The
goal of the California Hydrogen Highway Network
initiative is to support and catalyze a rapid transition
to a clean, hydrogen transportation economy in
California, thereby reducing our dependence on foreign
oil, and protecting our citizens from health harms
related to vehicle emissions. We have an opportunity to
deal with these problems by investing in California's
ability to innovate our way to a clean hydrogen future,
thus bringing jobs, investment, and continued economic
prosperity to California. We have an opportunity to
prove to the world that a thriving environment and
economy can co-exist."
(Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's California Hydrogen
Highway Network Action Plan)
Tonight I'm proposing $1.2 billion in research funding so that
America can lead the world in developing clean, hydrogen-powered
automobiles.
A simple chemical reaction between hydrogen and oxygen generates
energy, which can be used to power a car, producing only water,
not exhaust fumes.
With a new national commitment, our scientists and engineers
will overcome obstacles to taking these cars from laboratory to
showroom, so that the first car driven by a child born today
could be powered by hydrogen, and pollution-free.
Join me in this important innovation to make our air
significantly cleaner, and our country much less dependent on
foreign sources of energy.
George W. Bush
State of the Union
January 2003
|